223 Girraj Gupta M/S Ashok Kumar and brothers CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. 1. JMIC, Pehowa vide which application of respondent M/s Ashok Kumar and Brothers for leading additional evidence in the complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act was allowed. Vide impugned order, learned JMIC, Pehowa Chand son of Sh. Bisesher Dass who made entries in the whose name could not be included in the list of witnesses. 2. date of hearing, there was no repr 3. State of Maharasthra and being interlocutory in nature, the revision petition is not maintainable. 4. 5. 03.07.2026 Kapil IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Girraj Gupta VERSUS M/S Ashok Kumar and brothers CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL None for the petitioner. *** Shalini Singh Nagpal, J. The revision petition assails order dated 11.02.2020 of learned Pehowa vide which application of respondent M/s Ashok Kumar and for leading additional evidence in the complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act was allowed. Vide impugned order, learned , Pehowa permitted the complainant to ex Chand son of Sh. Bisesher Dass who made entries in the whose name could not be included in the list of witnesses. None is appearing to prosecute the petition. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In view of law laid down in ‘Subramanium Sethuraman vs. State of Maharasthra and another’ 2004(4) RCR (Criminal) 349 being interlocutory in nature, the revision petition is not maintainable. Dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-593-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.07.2026 Petitioner Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL revision petition assails order dated 11.02.2020 of learned Pehowa vide which application of respondent M/s Ashok Kumar and for leading additional evidence in the complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act was allowed. Vide impugned order, learned permitted the complainant to examine its Clerk Subhash Chand son of Sh. Bisesher Dass who made entries in the bahi and ledger and whose name could not be included in the list of witnesses. None is appearing to prosecute the petition. Even on the last esentation on behalf of the petitioner. Subramanium Sethuraman vs. ’ 2004(4) RCR (Criminal) 349, the order being interlocutory in nature, the revision petition is not maintainable. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Yes/No M) .2026 Petitioner Respondent revision petition assails order dated 11.02.2020 of learned Pehowa vide which application of respondent M/s Ashok Kumar and for leading additional evidence in the complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act was allowed. Vide impugned order, learned amine its Clerk Subhash and ledger and None is appearing to prosecute the petition. Even on the last Subramanium Sethuraman vs. the order (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) KAPIL 2026.07.03 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document