Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:9503 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2153 of 2026 ------
1. Bharatlal Yadav, Aged about- 50 years;
2. Lalu Kumar Yadav, Aged about 31 years; Both petitioner No,-1 & 2 are S/o Benilal Yadav and are Resident of Vill. Dihari, Hajipur Bhitta, P.O. Mirzachowki, P.S.- Mufassil, District - Sahebganj (Jharkhand) PIN-813208
… … Petitioner(s) Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Secretary, Building Construction Department of Jharkhand, 3rd Floor, Project Bhawan, PO+PS- Dhurwa, District - Ranchi (Jharkhand).
3. Deputy Commissioner (D.C.), Collectorate Building, PO+PS - Sahebganj, District - Sahebganj (Jharkhand)
4. District Land Acquisition Officer, Collectorate Building, PO+PS Sahebganj, District - Sahebganj (Jharkhand).
5. Engineer-in-Chief, Building Construction Department (Govt. of. Jharkhand), District - Sahebganj (Jahrkhand)
6. Regional Officer, NHAI Regional Office, C-129, Vidyalaya Marg, Road No. 2C, Ashok Nagar, PO- Doranda, District- Ranchi.
7. Project Director, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), PIU Sahebganj, 2nd Floor, SDO Kothi, Sakrugarh, PO+PS-Sahebganj, District-Sahebganj (Jharkhand). … … Respondent(s) ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Faisal Allam, AC to SC Mines-III
Ms. Sweety Topno, Advocate
Mr. Amit Raj Kisku, Advocate.
------ 02/ 06th April, 2026
1.
Heard the parties.
2.
It is the grievance of the petitioners that though the land along with house and other structure over it, has been acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956 but the adequate compensation has not been paid. He submits that the compensation which is being paid is less than the actual amount. He further submits that the measurement of the area has also not been made properly.
3.
Since, it is an admitted case that the land has been acquired in terms of the National Highways Act, I direct the
2026:JHHC:9503 2
petitioners to approach appropriate authority under the National Highways Act as there are sufficient provisions in the Act for redressal of the grievance of the petitioners. The respondents will pass an appropriate order in terms of the Act and if necessary, may refer the matter for arbitration also.
4.
The petitioners are
directed to file a fresh representation before the authorities.
5.
With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
06.04.2026
S.K.D/Cp-2
Uploaded on 08.04.2026