Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25842 (AP)

MSR CONSTRUCTIONS v. G.SAI PRASAD, IAS

CC/3208/2025 · 2026-01-05

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010584262025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3208/2025 Between: 1. MSR CONSTRUCTIONS, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER M. ABHINAY, S/O SREENIVASULU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O RAMUDUPALEM VILLAGE, MYPADU INDUKURPETA MANDAL NELLORE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. S DESE NAIK, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE AND COMMAND DEVELOPMENT, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, COMMISSIONER CADA WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, HANUMAN PET, VIJAYAWADA. 5. S DESE NAIK IN CHARGE, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, NELLORE CENTRAL DIVISION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue summons to the Respondents upon due enquiry may be pleased to punish the Respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for their willful disobedience of order dated 08.05.2025 passed in Writ Petition No 8632 of 2024 on the file of this Honble court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the respondents. Hence, no further orders are required in the contempt case. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.01.2026 KAS 33 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2980/2025 Dated: 06.01.2026 KAS