Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25839 (CHH)

XYZ v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRR/849/2026 · 2026-07-08

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010237772026 2026:CGHC:28431 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 849 of 2026 1 - XYZ (Juvenile In Conflict With Law Description Of Applicant And Legal Guardian Is In Closed Envelope) ... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate, Balrampur Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Rohitashva Singh, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 09/07/ 2026 1. The present Revision petition under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for short “the Act, 2015”) has been preferred against the impugned order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC, (POCSO Act) Ramanjuganj, District - Balrampur- Ramanujganj, C.G. in Criminal Appeal No. 5/2026, upholding the order dated 09.01.2026 passed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Balrampur, District – Balrampur- Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.07.10 10:07:31 +0530 2 Ramanujganj (C.G.) rejecting the bail application of the applicant in connection with Crime No. 164/2025 registered at Police Station Shankargarh, District – Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 65(2) of B.N.S., Sections 4(2), 6 of POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(V) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection to this proposition put forth by the counsel for the applicant. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu