Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33388 WP No. 16537 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 16537 OF 2026 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN:
SMT RENUKAMMA W/O NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SY.NO.6/A, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS, JNANAGANGANAGAR, BANGALORE -560056
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADEESHACHARI., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE COMMISSIONER GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY, N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE-560002.
2.
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER, GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR, BANGALORE 560056
3. SMT.KAMALAMMA W/O BETTASWAMY,
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33388 WP No. 16537 of 2026
AGED 52 YEARS, R/A NO.7, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS, JNANAGANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560056.
4.
SRI. BETTASWAMY, R/A NO.7, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS, JNANAGANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560056.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SINCHANA MR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
V/O DTD 08.06.2026, NOTICE TO R3 & R4 IS DEFERRED)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER ANNEXURE-H DATED 2.3.2026 AND DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS TO REMOVE THE COMPOUND WALL ON THE PETITIONER'S COMPOUND WALL ON THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33388 WP No. 16537 of 2026
ORAL ORDER
On perusal of this Court's previous order dated 08.06.2026, Ms. Sinchana M R, the learned Standing counsel for the Greater Bengaluru Authority and its officers, is permitted to place on record mahazar and photograph. The Inspection Report is that the construction is without a plan and contrary to the bye-law parameters. Ms. Sinchana M R submits that no plan could have been granted because the property only has a 'B' Khata and that the report has been filed with the concerned for initiation of proceedings under the relevant statute.
In the light of the afore, the petition stands
disposed of.
SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
RB