1 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.768 OF 2005) APHC010590712005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] TUESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 768/2005 Between: 1. D. SUNDARARAM REDDY, REP., BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENATIVE D. DAYAKAR REDDY B-3/BLOCK-II, NO.5 (NEW) NORTH CRESCENT ROAD, T.NAGAR, CHENNAI-600017. ...APPELLANT AND 1. STATE OF A P ANOTHER, CAD DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF A.P., ACTING THROUGH THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, NELLORE. 2. THE STATE OF A P REP BY THE SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND, CAD DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF A.P., ACTING THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, I & E OF PENNAR DELTA DRAINAGE DIVISION NO.1, NELLORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal against the Judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.185 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore dated 29.4.2005. IA NO: 1 OF 2005(ASMP 1959 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased - IA NO: 2 OF 2005(ASMP 2642 OF 2005 2 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.768 OF 2005) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the above Ist Appeal and fix an early date of hearing Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SATHEESH KUMAR EERLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR APPEALS The Court made the following: JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff being aggrieved from the dismissal of his suit filed for recovery of money vide judgment and decree dated 29.04.2005 passed in O.S.No.185 of 1997 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Nellore. 2. Sri P. Sandeep, learned counsel, appears for the appellant’s counsel on record and submits that he has already given a no-objection vakalat to the appellant to engage another counsel. However, on verification of the record before us, no fresh vakalat engaging another counsel has been filed. 3. In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed “for want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. 3 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.768 OF 2005) As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date : 20.01.2026. JLV/RPD. 4 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.768 OF 2005) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM (DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION) APPEAL SUIT NO: 768 of 2005 Date: 20.01.2026 JLV/RPD.