IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.1104 of 2019 Decided on: 01.10.2026. _______________________________________________________________ Chandershekar and others ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. ....Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents No. 1 to 4 : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General. : Mr. Lokender Pal Thakur, Senior Penal Counsel, for respondent No. 5. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Petitioner has filed the writ petition before this Court seeking the following relief (s): (i) That further a writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued directing the respondents not to shift/repatriate the petitioners till the completion of Sarv Shiksha Abhiyan Programme and to allow them to continue work as coordinators in DIETs as well as in Sarv Shiksha Abhiyan, in the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 interest of justice. 2. Upon issuance of notice, pleadings were exchanged inter-se the parties in the present proceedings. 3. Upon listing of the matter, Learned Counsel, on Instructions, states that due to subsequent events, the petitioner does not intend to pursue the present proceedings. [Statement taken on record]. 4. Considering the statement, no further orders are required and the present proceedings are closed. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge October 01, 2026 (Anita)