MAHESH KUMAR MAHARIYA S/O LATE SHRI MOHAN LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3731/2026 · 2026-04-24
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2582 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2582 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:17483] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3731/2026 Mahesh Kumar Mahariya S/o Late Shri Mohan Lal, Age About 48 Years, R/o Kudan, Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khedar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 24/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 558/2024 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar(Sikar), District Sikar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 420, 406, 120-B IPC, under Sections 4, 5, 6 of Prize Chit Funds and Money Circulation Schemes Act and under Sections 3, 21 of The Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is behind the bars since 16.10.2025. He also submits that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed. He further submits that the name of the accused-petitioner is not in the FIR. He further submits that the main accused persons are Ranveer Bijarnia, Subhash Bijarnia, Sudesh and
[2026:RJ-JP:17483] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3731/2026] Upendra Bijarnia. Conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 16.10.2025; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed; that the name of the accused-petitioner is not in the FIR; that the main accused persons are Ranveer Bijarnia, Subhash Bijarnia, Sudesh and Upendra Bijarnia and trial is likely to take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Mahesh Kumar Mahariya S/o Late Shri Mohan Lal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:17483] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3731/2026]
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7.
In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /33