Smt.Sabirunnisa v. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary
WP/34128/2015 · 2026-02-10
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25818 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25818 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
::1::
APHC010587092015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 34128/2015 Between:
1. SMT.SABIRUNNISA, W/O.LATE S.A.SATTAR AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.42/347-12-1 SIMHAPURI COLONY, KADAPA
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
2. DIRECTOR OF MINES GEOLOGY, STATE OF A.P., BRKR BHAVAN TANK BUND, HYDERABAD.
3. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF MINES
GEOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NELLORE S.P.S .R.NELLORE DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the
::2::
High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to declare the Demand Notice No.19/M2/83 dated 28.9.2015 of the 3rd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and also contrary to the Order of the Hon'ble Court in WP No.21450/2015 dated 28.7.2015 and to set aside the same and to issue a consequential direction to the ri respondent to act in accordance with law
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY (AP)
::3::
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 34128/2015
This Court made the following ORDER:
Ms.Priyanvitha Popuri, learned counsel representing Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
_________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
DT: 11.02.2026 krk
::4::
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
W.P.No.34128 of 2015
DT: 11.02.2026 krk
93