Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25813 (HP)

VIJAY SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CMP-T/38/2026 · 2026-10-01

Sandeep Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

VIJAY SINGH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HP AND OTHERS CMP-T-38 of 2026 in EX.PT - 282 of 2024 01.10.2026 Present: Ms. Rashmi Parmar, Advocate, for the applicants/petitioners. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for non- applicants/ respondents No.1 & 2-State. Ms. Vanshika Bagga, Advocate, for the non- applicant/respondent No.3. While placing on record communication dated 08.09.2026, issued under the signature of the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary) has been directed to release interest at the rate of 9% and has been allotted a sum of Rs. 12,32,069/-. He further states that remaining amount of Rs. 27,53,570/- has been allotted to the Deputy Director of School Education (Secondary), Shimla, for the financial year 2026-27, for further disbursement to the petitioner. Having taken note of aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court sees no reason to keep the petition alive and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the Deputy Director of School Education to ensure that interest on delayed payment of grant-in-aid, which remains to be paid, is paid expeditiously, preferably within a period of 10 days, failing which petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present proceedings, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken for implementation of the judgment/order sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge October 01, 2026 (Sunil)