APHC010592222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 30605/2025 Between: 1. VEMAPURAM YUGANDHAR, S/O V.NAGARAJU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,D.NO.1-146, VIPPAMANUPATTEDA, SURAPPAKASAM, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH . 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIKALAHASTRI REVENUE DIVISION, SRIKALAHASTRI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERST WHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI REVENUE DIVISION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERST WHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERST WHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERST WHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, 2 BKM,J W.P.No.30605 of 2025 ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, O/O. MPDO, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, VIPPAMANUPATTEDA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAYALCHERUVU ABISHEK REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats 3 BKM,J W.P.No.30605 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 6 and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.8 and 9. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 9 in not taking action against the PGRS complaint dated 03.03.2025 with respect to the removal of illegal encroachments in the road to an extent of Ac.0.37 cents in Sy.No.490 of Vippamanupatteda Village, Surapakasam Revenue Village accounts, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District. 3. On the other hand, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.8 and 9 relying upon the written instructions of the 9th respondent dated 21.02.2026 submits that the land in Sy.No.490 to an extent of Ac.0.37 cents is classified as “Rastha”. The Tahsildar conducted the survey on 19.01.2026 in the presence of villagers in Sy.No.490 to an extent of Ac.0.37 cents which is classified as “Rastha Poramboke”. As per the survey report there are some encroachments in the said land. The Gram Panchayat issued show cause notice dated 19.02.2026 to the encroacher by name Mr. R. Prabhakar Reddy by duly giving 15 days time to him. The Gram Panchayat will remove the encroachments and also will repair the existing road following the due procedure. 4 BKM,J W.P.No.30605 of 2025 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances and recording the said instructions of the 9th respondent dated 21.02.2026, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The said instructions of the 9th respondent dated 21.02.2026 shall be made as part of the Court record. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 23.02.2026 PGT