CRL OP(MD). No. 9523 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20.05.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CRL OP(MD). No. 9523 of 2026 S.Chandran ...Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Panaiyappatti Police Station, Pudukkottai. (Crime No. 61 of 2026 ) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.C.Santhosh Kumar Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 61 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. 1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9523 of 2026 ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.05.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 20 r/w 25(1A) of Arms Act in Crime No. 61 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner assumed that the defacto complainant was monitoring him and due to which, on 11.05.2026, the petitioner was arming a deadly weapon and threatened the public. Hence the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that no one was injured in this case. He would further submit that he has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.05.2026. 2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9523 of 2026 Therefore, prayed to grant bail for the petitioner. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that based on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant, the case has been registered under Sections 20 r/w 25(1A) of Arms Act in Crime No. 61 of 2026. He would further submit that the petitioner has one previous case which is not similar in nature. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature and hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, nature of offence, and considering the facts that the petitioner has one previous case, which is not similar in nature and no one was injured in this case and also considering 3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9523 of 2026 the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9523 of 2026 [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (R V J) 20.05.2026 apd 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9523 of 2026 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam. 2.The Inspector of Police, Panaiyappatti Police Station, Pudukkottai. 3. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Thirumayam. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No. 9523 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J apd ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 9523 of 2026 Date : 20.05.2026 7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis