SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:2015 C528 No.195 of 2026 Shafat Akhta Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another With (Compounding Appl. No.01 of 2026) Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Tajhar Qayyum, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mrs. Pushpa Bhatt, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Abhishek Tiwari, learned counsel for Respondent no.2. 4. Present application has been filed by the applicant under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. alongwith compounding application, paper no.29, same is supported with the affidavits of applicant and respondent no.2 and signatures of the parties have been annexed therein. 5. By means of this 528 application, applicant has sought quashing of the FIR No.0229 of 2024, charge sheet dated 26.05.2024, summoning/cognizance order dated 04.01.2025 as well as the entire proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No.45 of 2025 State vs. Shafat Akhtar under Sections 323, 376, 504, 506 of IPC pending before leaned Addl. Sessions Judge/Fast Track Special Judge, Dehradun, District Dehradun. 6. Applicant as well as respondent no.2 are present in the Court. They are duly identified by their respective counsels. 7. Learned counsel for the parties have filed their respective affidavits along with the compounding application stating therein that with the involvement of the elders of the society, an amicable settlement has been arrived between the parties and now respondent no.2 has no grievance with the applicant. Both the parties submit that they do not wish to pursue the present criminal case any further and a compromise has been entered between them. 8. Learned State counsel has opposed the compounding application and submits that some of the offences are not compoundable. 9. This Court has interacted with the parties especially with respondent no.2, who submits before this Court that she does not want to proceed with the present criminal proceedings and the matter may be compounded whereas the applicant submits that there was some misunderstanding and whatever allegations have been levelled by respondent no.2, he tenders apology and submit that matter may be compounded. 10. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 11. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The entire proceedings of Special Sessions Trial No.45 of 2025 State vs. Shafat Akhtar pending before leaned Addl. Sessions Judge/Fast Track Special Judge, Dehradun, District Dehradun are hereby quashed. 12. Accordingly instant Criminal Misc. Application stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 23.03.2026 Arti