Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2026 DAILYLAW 258 (MEG)

VIJAYKUMAR DINESHCHANDRA AGRAWAL v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS.

Crl.Petn./30/2026 · 2026-05-14

Revati Mohite Dere

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.Petn.No.30/2026 with Crl.Petn.No.31/2026 Crl.Petn.No.32/2026 Date of Order: 14.05.2026 Vijaykumar Dineshchandra Agarwal ..... Petitioner Vs. 1. State of Meghalaya duly represented by the Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. Officer-in-Charge, Rynjah Police Station, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 3. Shri Sankar Thapa. ..... Respondents Sunil Dineshchandra Agarwal ..... Petitioner Vs. 1. State of Meghalaya duly represented by the Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. Officer-in-Charge, Rynjah Police Station, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 3. Shri Sankar Thapa. ..... Respondents Anand Tripathi ..... Petitioner Vs. 1. State of Meghalaya duly represented by the Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. Officer-in-Charge, Rynjah Police Station, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 3. Shri Sankar Thapa. ..... Respondents Serial Nos.05 to 07 Daily List 2026:MLHC:461 Coram: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr. H.L. Shangreiso, Sr.Adv with Mr. T. Dkhar, Adv For the Respondents : Mrs. N.G. Shylla, PP with Mr. A.M. Pala, GA ORDER: (Oral) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By these petitions, the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR registered with the Rynjah Police Station, East Khasi Hills, being P.S. Case No.341(12) of 2025, for the alleged offence punishable under Section 351(2) of the BNS. 3. Learned PP has tendered a photo copy of the police report dated 13th May, 2026. The said report is taken on record. From the said report, it appears that the police have presently closed the case after observing, that the case is true but for want of evidence and that the case may be revived, whenever evidence is received in support of the case. Thus, primarily it appears that the report is an ‘A’ summary report. 4. In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives for further consideration in these petitions, petitions stand disposed of. 2026:MLHC:461 5. Needless to state that, if in future the occasion so arises, where the case is revived/reviewed or a fresh cause of action arises, the petitioners are at liberty to file a fresh petition, which will be considered on its own merits. (Revati Mohite Dere) Chief Justice Meghalaya 14.05.2026 “Lam DR-PS” 2026:MLHC:461 Digitally signed by LAMPHRANG KHARCHANDY Date: 2026.05.14 15:42:50 IST