Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040003682026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/100/2026 Rigam Taniang Son of Late Rigam Tasa, resident of Tani Village, PO and PS Tali, Kra Daadi District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP nad Anr represented by Chief Secretary, Itanagar. 2:The Additional Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Tali PO and PS Tali Kra Daadi District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Chorpok Modi, Tadar Bai,Biri Esther,Wanglat Khomrang,Nannu Yubi,Maklek Lego,Tame Rimi,K Gara,Uttam Deka Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 17.03.2026 Heard Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh. 2. In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Page No.# 2/3 petitioner has prayed for issuing direction to the respondent authorities, especially, the respondent No. 2, i.e., the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Tali, Kra Daadi district; to dispose of the representation, dated 05.03.2026, so filed by the petitioner herein; by passing a speaking order, after hearing both the parties. 3. Mr. Modi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is having a plot of land, within the land affected area of the Kamla Hydroelectric Project, at Tali Circle, under Kra Daadi district, Arunachal Pradesh and that, there was a dispute between the petitioner and the other parties, in respect of the said plot of land. Thereafter, the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Tali, Kra Daadi district, has ordered to discuss the matter in the Customary Court, in order to decide the ownership of the said plot of land and thereafter, a decision was drawn in favour of the petitioner. 3.1. Mr. Modi, further submits that after expiry of the appeal period, the petitioner herein had approached the ADC, Tali, Kra Daadi district, for inclusion of his name in the beneficiaries list of the said affected project, on 05.03.2026. But, the same has failed to evoke any response from the ADC, Tali, Kra Daadi district, till date. 3.2 It is also the submission of Mr. Modi, that this petition may be disposed of, by directing the respondent No. 2, ADC, Tali, Kra Daadi district; to dispose of the representation, dated 05.03.2026, filed by the petitioner, by a speaking order; after affording an opportunity of being heard to him. 4. Mr. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh Page No.# 3/3 submits that he has no objection in the event of directing the respondent No. 2, to dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner; without, however, entering into the merits of this petition. 5. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of the learned counsel for both the parties, this Court is inclined to dispose of this petition, by directing the respondent No. 2, the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Tali, Kra Daadi district; to dispose of the representation, dated 05.03.2026; after affording an opportunity of hearing all the parties and thereafter, to pass a speaking order. 6. The aforesaid exercise has to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. The petitioner shall obtain a certified copy of the order and place the same before the respondent authorities, within a period of one week from today. 7. In terms of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant