CR No.4857 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Bank of India M/s Agson Global Private Limited CORAM: Present: JAGMOHAN BANSAL 1. Constitution of India (Annexure P issued notice, however, did not grant any interim relief in terms of Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC 2. has no hesitation to vacate the demised premises months’ time to vacate the ground floor of the premises. They undertake to vacate the said premises on or before the expiry of three months from today. CR No.4857-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR Date of decision : Bank of India Versus M/s Agson Global Private Limited CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Mr. Jatinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner-Bank. Mr. Hemant Bassi, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Gursimran Kaur, Advocate, and Ms. Saloni Chhabra, Advocate, for the respondent. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. ( Oral ) The petitioner through instant petition under Article Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated (Annexure P-9), whereby learned Civil Judge (Junior issued notice, however, did not grant any interim relief in terms of Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that has no hesitation to vacate the demised premises months’ time to vacate the said premises. Their goods are still lying on the ground floor of the premises. They undertake to vacate the said premises on or before the expiry of three months from today. -1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-4857-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 02.07.2026 …….Petitioner ...….Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Mr. Jatinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate, Advocate, with Ms. Gursimran Kaur, Advocate, and Ms. Saloni Chhabra, Advocate, The petitioner through instant petition under Article 227 of the setting aside of order dated 30.05.2026 learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sonepat, has issued notice, however, did not grant any interim relief in terms of Order 39 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner/Bank has no hesitation to vacate the demised premises, however, they need three premises. Their goods are still lying on the ground floor of the premises. They undertake to vacate the said premises on or before the expiry of three months from today. 1- 227 of the 30.05.2026 Division), Sonepat, has issued notice, however, did not grant any interim relief in terms of Order 39 petitioner/Bank ed three premises. Their goods are still lying on the ground floor of the premises. They undertake to vacate the said premises on or VINAY MAHAJAN 2026.07.03 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR No.4857-2026 (O&M) -2- 3. Learned counsel for the respondent does not oppose the aforesaid prayer and assures the Court that no damage would be caused to goods of the petitioner in the meantime. 4. In the wake of aforesaid stand, the petition stands disposed of with a direction that petitioner shall vacate the demised premises on or before the expiry of three months from today. In the meantime, the parties shall maintain status quo. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) July, 02, 2026 JUDGE Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VINAY MAHAJAN 2026.07.03 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document