CRWP-7753-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (113 ) AKANSHA AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Sahil Loura, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Apoorv Garg, A MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of representation dated 27.06.2026 (Annexure P 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 27.06.2026 before the 5) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would b appropriate directions 2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision : 03.07.2026 AKANSHA AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Sahil Loura, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7 and to take action on their representation dated 27.06.2026 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 27.06.2026 before the Superintendent of Police, Yamunagar (Annexure P 5) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would b appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-7753-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 03.07.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Sahil Loura, Advocate for the petitioners AG, Haryana The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the respondents No.4 to 7 and to take action on their 5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on Superintendent of Police, Yamunagar (Annexure P- 5) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if are issued to respondent No.2-Superintendent of AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.03 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-7753-2026 Police, Yamunanagar petitioners and take necessary action thereon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana behalf of the respondents due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to the course of the day. 5. In view of th commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their 03.07.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (1) Yamunanagar to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. r. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 27.06.2026 (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the r. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana, has advance notice on State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during e limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.03 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.