MICAYEL HANSDA @ MAYKEL HANSDA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./5061/2026 · 2026-09-09
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25779 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25779 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:27548 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 5061 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5061 of 2026
1. Micayel Hansda @ Maykel Hansda, aged about 27 years, son of Som Hansda
2. Som Hansda, aged about 56 years, son of Mangal Hansda, both resident of Village- Mahadevpur, P.O. Katharbari, P.S. Radhanagar, District- Sahibganj
… Petitioners
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----
For the Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, A.P.P.
-----
04/09.09.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No.482/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 323, 379, 504, 354, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Rajmahal.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner no.1 is the son of petitioner no.2 and false allegations are made against them. He further submits that initially complaint case was filed on 12.02.2021 for the alleged occurrence on 06.01.2021 and subsequently the complaint case has been converted into FIR on 05.07.2025. He next submits that false allegations are made against the petitioners and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of outraging the modesty. On these grounds, he submits that the prayer for anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected.
( 2026:JHHC:27548 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 5061 of 2026
5. Considering that the said allegation is made against father and son, which prima facie appears to be not possible and the alleged occurrence is said to be of 06.01.2021, whereas, the complaint case was filed on 12.02.2021 and it was converted into FIR on 05.07.2025 and in the attending
facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Rajmahal in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No.482/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 9th September, 2026 Ajay/