Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25776 (AP)

B. Saradamma v. The Vice Chairman and managing Director

WP/25437/2009 · 2026-03-08

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010587652009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 25437 OF 2009 Between: 1. B. SARADAMMA, W/O. KESAVA REDDY PROPERITOR OF M/S. AGRO RYTHU SEVA KANDRAM ANANTHAPUR MANDAL, R/O. H.NO. 28-417-B, SANGAMESH NAGAR ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, AGRO INDUSTRIES, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. HYDERABAD 2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, AGRO INDUSTRIES, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. HYDERABAD 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT 5. THE MANDAL AGRICULTURE OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT 6. K ARJUNAMMA, W/O. K. NARAYANA REDDY HOUSEWIFE R/O. 28- 2-965, NAVODAYA COLONY ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T S V L N SWAMY (SC FOR AGRO IDC LTD) 2. K SRINIVAS 3. BANDA PRASADA RAO(SC FOR TSAIDC) The Court made the following ORDER: At the time of considering the matter, Mr.S.Mahendra, learned counsel representing Mr.N.Aswartha Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the Interim Order granted on 20.11.2009, shall stand dissolved. NINALA JAYASURYA, J Date:09.03.2026 Ssv THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 25437 OF 2009 Date:09.03.2026 Ssv