Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2576 (CAL)

ANKIT KUMAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/267/2026 · 2026-02-13

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13.02.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.211 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (NDPS) 267 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 828 of 2025 dated 18.05.2025 under Sections 21(C)/25/27A/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. And In Re : Ankit Kumar ... Petitioner. Mr. Satadru Lahiri, Mrs. Benajir Hasna, Mr. Aliul Islam, Mr. Sadid Haider ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Arindam Sen, Md. Kutubuddin ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than eight months and the recovery was from a vehicle. Learned advocate submits that the recovery itself is very questionable and the prosecution has relied upon 17 witnesses. As such, there is no possibility of the trial concluding in near future. In CRM (NDPS) 225 of 2026 there is already a direction for splitting up the trial and proceeding to the stage of consideration of charges within a period of 90 days. At this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Petitioner would renew his prayer for bail after the aforesaid stage is over. 2 The application for bail, being CRM (NDPS) 267 of 2026, is, thus, dismissed. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)