Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25756 (AP)

K. Chand Basha (HG 464) v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/35232/2022 · 2026-02-26

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010583102022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 35232/2022 Between: 1. K. CHAND BASHA (HG 464),, S/O K. GOUSE MOHIDDIN, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 34 YRS, ANANTAPUR, R/O 6-1-248, LAKSHMINAGAR, ANANTAPUR 515 001M ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, HOME GUARDS, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTAPUR. 5. THE COMMANDANT, HOME GUARDS ORGANISATION, ANANTAPUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the order of removal from 2 service dated 15.3.2022 in C.No.11957/H1/2021 by the 41h Respondent and a consequential order passed in Appeal rejecting the claim of the Petitioner dated 23.9.2022 in Rc.No.163/HGs.Estt/ 2020-2 by the 211d Respondent and set aside the same with all consequential service benefits and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to reinstate the Petitioner in to service as Home Guard by suspending the order of the 4th Respondent dated 15.3.2022 and consequential order dated 23.9.2022 passed by the 2nd Respondent pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SREEDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 35232 of 2022 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was died, and that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 27.02.2026 CMK/SSA