APHC010588622018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 28018/2018 Between: 1. P. SATYANARAYANAMMA, S/ O. SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE RESIDING AT 2-167, KARAPA VILLAGE AND MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KARAPA MANDAL, KARAPA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. THE GRAM PANCHAYAT KARAPA, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus by declaring the action of the Tahasildar, Karapa Mandal in demolition of the existing houses without following the principles of natural justice and due process of law by giving notice calling for explanation as arbitrary, illegal and opposed to the principles of natural justice and to direct the respondent not to demolish 2 JS,J W.P.No.28018 of 2018 the structures existing in Sy.No.249 at Karapa .village without following due process of law and may pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent i.e., Tahasildar Karapa Mandal, E.G.District not to demolish the existing structures ana houses in the layout in Sy.No.249 at Karapa Village during the pendency of the above writ petition and may pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) This Court made the following: 3 JS,J W.P.No.28018 of 2018 ORDER: On 04.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on his behalf. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents, submits that the petitioner has vacated the land in Sy.No.249 situated at Karapa Village & Mandal, East Godavari District, and at present, there are no encroachments in the subject land and it is being used as a pathway. In view of the aforesaid submission, this Court is of the view that no further orders are required in the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 9th February, 2026 cbs 4 JS,J W.P.No.28018 of 2018 THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.28018 of 2018 9th February, 2026 cbs