Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25751 (PNJ)

RAGHBIR RATTAN AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/19258/2026 · 2026-07-02

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, Sanjiv Berry

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-19258-2026 (O&M) -1- 118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-19258-2026(O&M) Date of Decision: 02.07.2026 RAGHBIR RATTAN AND OTHERS ....Petitioner (s) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present: Mr.H.S. Saggu, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (Oral) 1. At the outset, Ms. Shruti, learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab has submitted on instruction from Sukhwinder Singh, Senior Assistant that the impugned order (Annexure P-12) will be withdrawn by the Administrator, New Mandi Township, Punjab because the calculations pertaining to the outstanding amount have not been mentioned in the said order, with a liberty to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction that after withdrawal of the impugned order (Annexure P-12), the Administrator, New Mandi Township, Punjab shall pass a fresh order strictly in accordance with law, after giving adequate opportunity of hearing to the petitioners or their counsels, within a period of two months from today. RAKESH KUMAR 2026.07.03 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-19258-2026 (O&M) -2- 3. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the said order, in case they so desire. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 02.07.2026 rakesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAKESH KUMAR 2026.07.03 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment