Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16383] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6858/2026 Babulal Gupta S/o Shri Bhagwan Sahay Gupta, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Address- 7/165, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Smt. Anandi, Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority (Jda), Jln Marg, Jaipur- 302004.
2. Tara Mati Vaishnav, Dy. Commissioner Zone 9, Jaipur Development Authority, Jln Marg, Jaipur- 302004.
3. Anuj Aroda Partner Bhavy Green Builers, A-405, Maharaja Agrasain Marg, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur- 302017. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. D. Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishab Khandelwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 18/04/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a limited prayer for the early disposal of Contempt Petition No. 57/2025, which is presently pending adjudication before the learned Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Development Authority (JDA), Jaipur.
2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that an underlying order dated 18.04.2024 came to be passed by the JDA. Alleging willful non-compliance of the said order, the petitioner was constrained to prefer the aforementioned contempt petition before the learned JDA Appellate Tribunal.
[2026:RJ-JP:16383] (2 of 2) [CW-6858/2026]
3. It is submitted that despite the passage of a considerable period of time, the said contempt proceedings have remained sub judice for the past 9 months. It is vehemently argued that such administrative delay frustrates the very objective of the initial
order and causes grave prejudice to the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, without delving into the merits of the underlying dispute, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition. The Presiding Officer, Appellate Tribunal, JDA, Jaipur, is directed to consider and adjudicate the sub judice contempt petition as expeditiously as possible, strictly in accordance with the law, and preferably within a period of 60 days.
5. In view of the above terms, the instant writ petition stands
disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand(s)
disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /15