Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2575 (MAD)

A.BAKIYALAKSHMI v. The District collector

WP/14046/2026 · 2026-04-17

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 14046 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 14046 of 2026 A.Bakiyalakshmi ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Collectorate Kancheepuram District -631 501. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer (Kancheepuram Taluk) The Revenue Divisional officer Kancheepuram District. 3. The Tahsildar Taluk office Walajabad Taluk Kancheepuram District. 4. Arumugam 5. Krishnamoorthy ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent 1 and 3 to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 12.01.2026 submitted for cancellation of patta in respect Survey Nos.465/3B, 465/1 and 465/4 situated at Agaram village, Walajabad, Kancheepuram District. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14046 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.M.Balaji For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Government Advocate (For R1 to R3) O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to cancel the patta standing in the name of the respondents 4 and 5 for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition, based on the petitioner’s representation dated 12.01.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.According to the petitioner, illegally the respondents 4 and 5 have obtained patta for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition. The petitioner had given a representation on 12.01.2026 to the 2nd respondent, seeking for cancellation of the patta standing in the name of the respondents 4 and 5. Since the said representation was not considered, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 3.Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 and 5 in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 4 and 5 is dispensed with. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14046 of 2026 petitoner’s represenation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the respondents 4 and 5 and any other third party whom the 2nd respondent deem fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation dated 12.01.2026. 4.For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 2nd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 12.01.2026, seeking for cancellation of the patta standing in the name of the respondents 4 and 5, for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition, by giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the respondents 4 and 5 and any other third party, whom the 2nd respondent deem fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 17.04.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GSA __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14046 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA To 1. The District collector Collectorate Kancheepuram District -631 501. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer (Kancheepuram Taluk) The Revenue Divisional officer Kancheepuram District. 3. The Tahsildar Taluk office Walajabad Taluk Kancheepuram District. WP No. 14046 of 2026 17-04-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis