( 2026:JHHC:27492 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 728 of 2025 ------ 1. Kameshwar Ram, S/o Late Timal Ram, aged about 55 years, resident of Village –Morwe, P.O. –Morwe, P.S. –Manjhiaon, District –Garhwa, Jharkhand. 2. Karamdeo Ram, S/o Late Somaru Ram, aged about 55 years, resident of Village –Morwe, P.O. –Morwe, P.S. –Manjhiaon, District –Garhwa, Jharkhand. 3. Jay Shree Ram, S/o Late Bihari Ram, aged about 55 years, resident of Village –Morwe, P.O. –Morwe, P.S. –Manjhiaon, District –Garhwa, Jharkhand. 4. Prabhu Ram, S/o Late Dhanraj Ram, aged about 55 years, resident of Village –Morwe, P.O. –Morwe, P.S. –Manjhiaon, District –Garhwa, Jharkhand. 5. Bindeshwari Ram, S/o Late Jatai Ram, aged about 56 years, resident of Village –Morwe, P.O. –Morwe, P.S. –Manjhiaon, District –Garhwa, Jharkhand. 6. Akalu Ram, S/o Late Nanhak Ram, aged about 55 years, resident of Village –Morwe, P.O. –Morwe, P.S. –Manjhiaon, District –Garhwa, Jharkhand. 7. Shankar Ram, S/o Late Budhu Ram, aged about 47 years, resident of Village –Morwe, P.O. –Morwe, P.S. –Manjhiaon, District –Garhwa, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner, Garnwa, P.O.+P.S. & District –Garhwa 2. Exective Engineer, Rupankan Division No.2, Medininagar, P.O.+P.S. –Medininagar, District –Palamau, Jharkhand. .... .... .... Opp. Parties ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner s : Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, SC-I ------ Order No.03 Dated- 11.09.2026 Heard the parties. This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioners for restoration of F.A. No. 263 of 2023 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that F.A. No. 263 of 2023 was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order of this Court dated 05.12.2024 whereby appellants who are the petitioners herein were directed to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within eight weeks. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that as the appellants who are the petitioners herein could not arrange the court fees of Rs.12,480/- within the stipulated time, the said defects could not be removed within the stipulated time resulting in dismissal of the said F.A. No. 263 of 2023. It is next submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said F.A. No. 263 of 2023 and unless F.A. No. 263 of 2023 is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that F.A. No. 263 of 2023 be restored to its original file. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, F.A. No. 263 of 2023 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal. List F.A. No. 263 of 2023 under the appropriate heading after a week before the appropriate Bench. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 11.09.2026 Sonu-