- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31475 WP No. 34756 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 34756 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI SHANTHALA K W/O RAJKUMAR N V AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.127, 3RD FLOOR, T2 FLAT, KIRLOSKAR FOUNTARY ROAD, MAHALAKSHMI FURTHER EXTN BENGALURU-560 086 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T SESHAGIRI RAO., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VKASA SODHA, BANGAORE-560001 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, BBMP, BENGALURU HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 009 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R2 SRI. G RAMESH NAIK, AGA FOR R1) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31475 WP No. 34756 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDERS ISSUED BY THE R2 DATED 16.12.2024 BEARING NO. NAE(P) PR/148/2024-25 AT ANNEXURE A, PURPORTEDLY BASED ON ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 DATED 14.11.2024 BEARING GO-NO. NAE 801 MNU 2024 AT ANNEXURE A1. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs: (i) Issue a writ/order /direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned orders issued by the r2 dated 16.12.2024 bearing No.NAE(P) PR/148/2024-25 at Annexure-A, purportedly based on order passed by the respondent no.1 dated 14.11.2024 bearing GO-NO. NAE 801 MNU 2024 at Annexure A1 to meet the ends of justice and equity and (ii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the current case to meet the ends of justice and equity. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31475 WP No. 34756 of 2024 2. The petitioner has challenged the order of suspension in this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of suspension has been revoked and the petitioner has been reinstated into service and in view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition; as such, the writ petition may be disposed of as having rendered infructuous. 4. Submission is placed on record. 5. The writ petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. 6. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, pending interlocutory applications do not survive for consideration and accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23