- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32306-DB WA No. 95 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 95 OF 2025 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI PUTTARAJ S/O LATE MARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 2. SRI.M. CHENNAKESHAVA S/O LATE MARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT MACHOHALLI VILLAGE KADABAGERE CROSS DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VINOD C S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN -DEVELOPMENT, STATE OF KARNATAKA M. S. BUILDING BANGALORE-560 009 Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32306-DB WA No. 95 of 2025 3. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BANGALORE-560 020. 4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MURUGESH.V.CHARATI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3 & C/R4; SRI. SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN WP No-8235/2021 (LA-BDA) ON THE FILE OF LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT, ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) The present intra Court appeal has been filed impugning the judgment and order dated 20.12.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.61154/2014 and other connected writ petitions. 2. After filing the appeal, the learned counsel for the appellants has not chosen to appear on almost all the hearings. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32306-DB WA No. 95 of 2025 3. Learned counsel for the respondent-BDA submits that at Paragraph-12 of the affidavit dated 30.06.2026 submitted by the Commissioner, BDA (in W.A.No.175/2025) it has been stated that the appellants in W.A.No.95/2025 have taken the cash and site compensation at the ratio of 50:50 and after accepting the said compensation they have no right to challenge the impugned judgment and order. 4. Considering the above submission of the learned counsel for the respondent-BDA, the writ appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE RKA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0