Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2573 (GAU)

SAHIDUL SHEIKH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/394/2026 · 2026-03-15

Pranjal Das

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010036132026 2026:GAU-AS:3841 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/394/2026 SAHIDUL SHEIKH S/O SAHED ALI SHEIKH, R/O VILL DHIRERCHAR PART I, PO CHAPAR,PIN- 783371, PS CHAPAR, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. B GOGOI, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 16-03-2026 Heard Ms. M Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. S. Lahkar, learned Additional PP for the State. This is an application filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, (BNSS) 2023 praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the Page No.# 2/2 accused applicant in connection with Abhayapuri P.S. Case No.265/2025, registered under Sections 331(4)/305(a) of BNS, 2023. The case relates to the lodging of an FIR dated 29.11.2024 alleging that some miscreants entered the house of the informant and, after spraying a certain substance on the faces of three family members, broke open the almirah and left after stealing gold ornaments along with cash amounting to Rs. 24,000/-. The case diary is received. The prosecution submits that there are sufficient implicating materials against the present petitioner and investigation is giving support to the alleged offences and the properties which was subject of the alleged robbery have also not been recovered. The investigation is going on. In this circumstances, perhaps it may not be appropriate to grant bail at this stage. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail petition stands rejected at this stage. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant