Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25725 (KAR)

SRI CHIKKAMAHADEVAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/17136/2026 · 2026-07-01

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32671-DB WP No. 17136 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.17136 OF 2026 (GM-MM-S) BETWEEN: SRI CHIKKAMAHADEVAPPA S/O LATE MADAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RANGAAPURA VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, GUNDLUPET TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571109. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.V. BHANU PRAKASH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHAIRMAN DISTRICT TASK FORECE, AUTHORITY FOR REGULATION & LICENSING OF CRUSHER UNITS, CHAMRAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571313. 3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR/SENIOR GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT - 571313. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32671-DB WP No. 17136 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY APPROPRIATE DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3 TO ACT UPON THE REPRESENTATIONS MADE BY THE PETITIONER AND TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION OR ANY SUCH APPROPRIATE STRINGENT STEPS UNDER THE REPRESENTATION VIDE ANNEXURE-F DATED 28/03/2024. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under: "(i) Issue writ of mandamus or any appropriate direction directing the respondents No.1 to 3 to act upon the representations made by the petitioner and to take appropriate action or any such appropriate stringent steps under the representation vide ANNEXURE-F dated 28.03.2024; (ii) pass any other writ or direction which may be deemed fit to grant under the above facts and circumstances, in the interest of justice and equity." 2. The petitioner states that he filed an application on 29.08.2006 for grant of a quarry lease for extracting building stone over land measuring 3 acres falling in Survey No.122, Arepura - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32671-DB WP No. 17136 of 2026 Village, Begur Hobli, Gundlupet Taluk, Chamarajanagara District. The petitioner claims that he has also paid the requisite application fee of `1,000/- and a sum of `7,500/- towards the security deposit. The petitioner states that he had made these payments to the office of respondent No.3 and an acknowledgment dated 04.09.2006 was issued. It is his case that no communication was thereafter received from the authorities. 3. The petitioner states that, in the given circumstances, he made a representation dated 28.03.2024, requesting consideration of his application, which has also not been considered. 4. As is apparent from the above, the present petition is highly belated and we do not consider it apposite to entertain the same. The petitioner's application was submitted on 29.08.2006. Thereafter, no steps were taken for considerable period to pursue the matter. If the petitioner was aggrieved by the non-consideration of his application, he was not precluded from availing the remedies at the material point of time. However, it is apparent that the petitioner did not take any immediate steps. He filed a representation only on 28.03.2024 nearly 18 years after filing the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32671-DB WP No. 17136 of 2026 application. The present petition has been filed more than two years after the submission of the said representation. 5. The learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the petitioner's application was rejected way back in August 2008 and he has produced a photocopy of the said register extract. 6. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE MBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15