Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25724 (AP)

PUTTAVENKATESWARA RAO AND 2 OTHERS v. HABIBUNNISA BEGUM [DIED] AND 3 OTHERS

CRP/2556/2011 · 2026-03-11

Balaji Medamalli

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010588192011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2556/2011 Between: 1. PUTTAVENKATESWARA RAO AND 2 OTHERS, S/O LATE RAMA RAO MUNICIPAL COUNCILOR R/O KALINGA ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 2. P. SAKUNTHALAMMA, W/O LATE RAMA RAO C/O ANJANI KUMAR, ADVOCATE BRIDGE ROAD, NEAR UMARUDRA KOTESWARA TEMPLE, 3. P. RAJAKUMARI, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO ADVOCATE R/O G.T. ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. HABIBUNNISA BEGUM DIED AND 3 OTHERS, W/O VENKATESWARA RAO ADVOCATE R/O G.T. ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 2. M A RAVIOOF, S/O M. HASNUAMA R/O KAKI STREET, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 3. ADEEBI HASAM, S/O M.HASANUZZSAMA, R/O KAKI STREET, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 4. PRADEEP MANDAL, S/O NOT KNOWN BUSINESS R/O PLOT NO.11, VISAKHA B COLONY, SRIKAKULAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. D RAMALINGA SWAMY 2. N ANULA 3. D VIVEKANANDA PATNAIK The Court made the following ORDER : Sri S.Krishna Vamsi, learned counsel representing Sri K.Murali Krishna, learned for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 12.03.2026. Dvs 117 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2556/2011 Dt: 12.03.2026 Dvs