Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25716 (AP)

N SESHA SAI SURYA KALYAN, W.G. DIST v. SECY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPT., HYD & 4 OT

WP/45478/2016 · 2026-01-07

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010586552016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45478/2016 Between: N Sesha Sai Surya Kalyan, W.g. Dist ...PETITIONER AND Secy School Education Dept Hyd 4 Ot and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45478 of 2016 Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: <to Issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus, Declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 10-08-2016 for appointment on compassionate grounds in the 5th respondent College as per G.O. Ms. No. 113, Education ( SE. PS. I) Department, dated o6-102009 as well as the Circular Memo No. 35252/Ser. G/A1/2o11-1, dated 04- 12- 2013 issued by the Government but returning the same stating that the Government imposed Ban of appointments in G.O. Ms. No. 35, Higher Education ( CE.II-1 ) Department, dated 23-07-2006 is arbitrary, unreasonable as the said G.O. Ms. No. 35, Higher Education ( CE.II-1 ) Department, dated 23-07-2006 is not applicable for considering compassionate appointments and accordingly set aside the orders of the 1St respondent vide Memo No. 2887/IE/A2/2015, dated 22-8-2015 including the consequential orders of the 4th respondent in Rc. No. 1113/C2/ 2016, dated 28-11-2016 and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 10-08-2016 for appointment in any suitable vacancy as per his educational qualifications in the 5th respondent Junior College.= 2. On 31.12.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 8for dismissal9. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3 3. Sri Adinarayana Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education, submits that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives, as the petitioner9s candidature was considered and an appointment order was issued vide Rc. No. 01/2020–2021 dated 16.05.2020, whereby the petitioner was appointed as an Office Subordinate in respondent No.5 College. Consequently, the petitioner joined duties on 18.05.2020. In support of the said submission, the learned Assistant Government Pleader has also forwarded the relevant documents, namely the appointment order and the joining report, and the same are taken on record. 4. By recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education, and in view of the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 08.01.2026. ASR 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.45478 of 2016 08.01.2026 ASR