Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25712 (AP)

M.BALAKISHAN REDDY v. G.SAI PRASAD,IAS

CC/3207/2025 · 2026-01-21

T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010583912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3207/2025 Between: 1. M.BALAKISHAN REDDY, S/O M VENKATESWARULU,D.NO 24-1-204 2ND FLOOR, B4, SUJATHAMMA COLONY, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. S DESE NAIK, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE AND COMMAND DEVELOPMENT, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. S DESE NAIK IN CHARGE, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, NELLORE CENTRAL DIVISION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, COMMISSIONER CADA WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, HANUMAN PET, VIJAYAWADA. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue summons to the Respondents upon due enquiry may be pleased to punish the Respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for their willful disobedience of order dated 31.07.2025 passed in Writ Petition No 8624 of 2024 on the file of this Honble court and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following: ORDER:- 1. It is represented by the learned counsel for the respondents that the order under contempt is complied with. The said submission is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In such circumstances, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the contempt case. 2. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.26.12.2025 SR