IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No. 299/2026 Decided on: 10.03.2026 Roshal Lal …Petitioner Versus CSKHPKV ....Respondent .……………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Arun Rana, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Prince Chauhan. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record a copy of office order dated 18.07.2025 along with another office order dated 26.11.2025 and on that basis submitted that the petitioner’s case has been considered and work charge status has now been accorded to him from an anterior date and corresponding pay-fixation stands carried out. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of above office orders, the present petition though be closed, however, liberty be reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any. 3. Granting such permission, the execution petition to stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 10th March, 2026 (rohit)