[2026:RJ-JP:11843-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 301/2025 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.176/2023 Manraj S/o Shri Heeralal Father/o Heera Lal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Gaddi Bharja, Ps Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur Rajasthan Presently At District Jail, Sawai Madhopur ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajatshatru Mina For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl. GA Mr. Amir Aziz HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 19/03/2026 This is second suspension of sentence application filed by the appellant. The first suspension of sentence application was dismissed by this Court on merits vide order dated 18.09.2023 which reads as under:- “1. Accused-applicant has preferred this application for suspension of sentence. 2. Heard on application for suspension of sentence. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant was on bail during trial. At most, it is the case of rash and negligent driving. It is also contended that the eye witnesses, who have shown [2026:RJ-JP:11843-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-301/2025] their presence, at the place of occurrence, are not reliable witnesses. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the suspension of sentence application. It is contended by learned counsel for the complainant that the applicant was paramour of wife of the deceased; he had threatened the deceased just prior to the incident and he accidented the motorcycle, as a result of which, the deceased expired. Thereafter, the trolley of tractor overturned and another lady who was standing on the road, has also expired. 5. We have considered the contentions and perused the material on record. 6. Considering the statements of PW/2 & PW/5 as well as the mechanical inspection report of the tractor and motorcycle, we are not inclined to entertain the suspension of sentence application. 7. Accordingly, the suspension of sentence application is dismissed.” Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application. After dismissal of the first suspension of sentence application of the appellant, there is no change in the circumstances except the change of counsel as well as the period of custody in the matter. In that view of the matter, We are not inclined to grant the indulgence to the appellant as prayed for. Hence, this second application for suspension of sentence stands dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI /5