1 CGHC010264842026 2026:CGHC:28822 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 619 of 2026 Divisional Railway Manager (S.E.C.R.) South Eastern Central Railways, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) - 495001 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Bina Kaushik Wd/ Late Chandrakant Kaushik R/o Vinayak Vihar D.D.U. Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 492010 2 - Ku. Diksha Kausahik D/o Late. Chandrakant Kaushik R/o Vinayak Vihar, D.D.U Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) – 492010 3 - Bhupesh Kaushik F/o Late. Chandrakant Kaushik R/o Vinayak Vihar D.D.U Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) – 492010 4 - Shivkumar Kaushik F/o Tanuram R/o Vinayak Vihar D.D.U Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) – 492010 5 - Lakshmi Kaushik W/o Shiv Kumar Kaushik R/o Vinayak Vihar D.D.U Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) - 492010 ... Respondent(s) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.07.10 17:40:48 +0530 2 (Cause title taken from CIS) This is an office reference. For petitioner :Shri T.S. Sahu, Central Govt. Counsel For Respondent(s) :None Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 10.07.2026 1. This is an office reference based on a PUD received from the Court of the Commissioner for Employees' Compensation, Raipur, seeking extension of time for compliance with the order passed by this Court in MAC No. 220 of 2023 (Divisional Railway Manager v. Smt. Bina Kaushik & Others). 2. It is stated that this Court, vide order dated 19.02.2026 passed in MAC No. 220 of 2023, while setting aside the 50% penalty imposed upon the non-applicant in Case No. 144/2022 (E.C. Act Fatal) by order dated 17.10.2022, remanded the matter to the learned Commissioner for fresh consideration on the question of penalty and directed that the proceedings be concluded within a period of two months. It is further stated that the records of the case were received by the learned Commissioner on 02.04.2026. Thereafter, the parties repeatedly sought time to explore the possibility of an 3 amicable settlement, and subsequently the matter was affected by the intervening summer vacation. Consequently, the matter could not be decided within the time stipulated by this Court. 3. Considering the reasons assigned by the learned Commissioner and the stage of the proceedings, the request appears to be bona fide and deserves to be allowed. 4. Accordingly, the time granted by this Court vide order dated 19.02.2026 for deciding the matter is extended by a further period of 40 (forty) days from the expiry of the period already granted. 5. With the aforesaid extension of time, the office reference stands disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib