Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33106 RSA No. 1389 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1389 OF 2025 (PAR) BETWEEN:
SRI. NARASIMHAMURTHY S/O VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT ANGAREKANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 101. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA S.V, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
SMT. V. PREMA W/O SHIVAKUMAR, D/O VENKATAREDDY AND BYRAMMA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT IDLOODU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI., SIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 101.
2. SMT.LAKSHMIDEVAMMA, W/O LATE. VENKATAREDDY, AGED 46 YEARS,
3.
SRI. NATARAJ, S/O LATE. VENKATAREDDY AND LAKSHMIDEVAMMA,
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33106 RSA No. 1389 of 2025
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R2 AND R3 R/AT DODDATHEKAHALLI VILLAGE, BASETTAHALLI HOBLI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.
4.
SMT. BYRAMMA, W/O VENKATAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT GOWDANAHALLI VILLAGE, BASETTAHALLI HOBLI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.
5.
SMT. RADAMMA, W/O VENKATAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT RAMACHANDRA HOSURU VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 101.
6.
SMT. RAJIKKALA, W/O RAVIKUMAR, D/O VENKATAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/AT KOLIMENAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 101. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.01.2025 PASSED IN RA NO.107/2024 ON THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKABALLAPURA., PARTLY
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33106 RSA No. 1389 of 2025
ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.07.2024 PASSED IN OS NO.332/2020 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKABALLAPURA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
None appears for the appellant. Office objections are not complied even after imposing cost by order dated 10.06.2026. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32