R. VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY v. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, IAS
CC/4761/2024 · 2026-03-05
B Krishna Mohan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25690 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25690 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010584482024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4761/2024 Between:
1. R. VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. D NO. 1-78, PANDALAPADU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI GOPALA KRISHNA DWIVEDI IAS, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND MARKETING MKTGII
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI S DILLI RAO IAS, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 5. SRI B BALU NAIK, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER
THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
PANCHAYAT RAJ
2 BKM,J C.C.No.4761 of 2024
DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 6. SRI G BRAMAIAH, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. SRI G RATNA BABU, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PR.PIU DIVISION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to call the contemners herein and to punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience and / deliberately violating the orders passed by this Honble Court in W.P. No. 11668 of 2024 dated 19.10.2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKAT SAILENDRA G Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. A JAYANTHI
3 BKM,J C.C.No.4761 of 2024
The Court made the following Order:
No representation for the petitioner. 2. However, the respondents’ counsel reports compliance of the orders in the contempt case by virtue of the instructions furnished from the Principal Secretary, Finance Department dated 06.03.2026 as detailed therein, which shall be made as part of the Court record. 3.
In view of the same, recording the said instructions of the Principal Secretary, Finance Department dated 06.03.2026, no cause survives in this Contempt Case. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
06.03.2026 PGT