Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25672 (AP)

S. Nani Babu v. The Government of AP

WP/33419/2012 · 2026-03-10

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010580182012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33419/2012 Between: 1.S. NANI BABU,, S/O SOMI NAIDU, AGE 32 YEARS, OCC : TECHNICAL ASSISTANT, PRI SUB-DIVISON,YELLAMANCHILI, R/O VIPPALAPALEM VILLAGE, CHODYAM POST, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE GOVERNMENT OF AP, REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR, DWMA, VISAKHAPATNAM TOWN & DISTRICT. 2.THE MPDO, MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, YELLAMANCHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI, NARSIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4.THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI SUB-DIVISON, YELLAMANCHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5.THE MANDAL ENGINEERING OFFICER, YELLAMANCHILI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the the action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner to discharge his duties as Technical Assistant in PRI Sub-Division, Yellamanchili, Visakhapatnam District in pursuance of proceedings Rc.No.218/AB/A1/2010, 16.12.2010 issued by 3rd respondent and also not paying the salaries for 45 days, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to Circular dt.27.01.2010 and also violative of Article 14 & 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to discharge his duties as Technical Assistant at 4th respondent's office with all consequential and incidental benefits attached to the post such as continuity of service, back wages, annualgrade increments as contemplated under Circular dt.27.01.2010 IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 42514 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to discharge his duties as Technical Assistant, PRI Sub-Division, Yeltamanchili, Visakhapatnam District 2 in pursuance of proceedings Rc.No.218/AB/A1/2010, dt.16.12.2010 issued by 3rd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2012(WPMP 42515 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pay the salaries of the petitioner for 45 days i.e., the period which he worked as Technical Assistant, PRI Sub-Division, Yellamanchili, Visakhapatnam district, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2012(WPMP 183254 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.33419 OF 2012 ORDER: 1. The petitioner is claiming salary for 45 days and also seeks a direction to the respondent to permit him to discharge his duties as Technical Assistant in PRI Sub-Division, Yalamanchili, Visakhapatnam. 2. The learned standing counsel submits that the petitioner’s services were deputed to the Executive Engineer, Panchayatraj, Narsipatnam and the salaries to be paid to the Mandal Mahila Samakhya. 3. It is also submitted that the petitioner was working on outsourcing basis and he would have to array the Mandal Mahila Samakhya as a party for claiming the said relief. It is further submitted that the petitioner is no longer in service and as such the cause in the writ petition does not survive. 4. Recording the submissions, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 11.03.2026 KGM 4 133 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.33419 of 2012 Dated 11.03.2026 KGM