KRISHNASAKHA GRAH NIRMAN SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT v. SHRI BALAJI LAND DEVELOPERS
WP227/731/2026 · 2026-07-09
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25667 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25667 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010203742026
2026:CGHC:29117
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 731 of 2026 Krishnasakha Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Registration Nuo 91, Years 1982, -83, Registered Under Chhattisgarh Sahkari Society Adhiniyam 1960, Address House No. 23, House Of Shri C.P. Yadu Krishnasakha Colony Rohinipuram Raipur Tehsil And District Raipur Through President Shri Arun Kumar Verma S/o Late Shri Vishnudutt Verma Aged Bout 67 R/o C-258, Rohinipuram Raipur C.G.
... Petitioner versus 1 - Shri Balaji Land Developers Partnership Firm Through Partners (a) - Shri Sunil Agrawal S/o Shri Latturam Agrawal Aged About 41 Years Both Are Resident Of Samta Colony Raipur District Raipur C.G. (b) - Shri Ashutosh Jakhodiya S/o Jaikishan Jakhodiya Resident Of Samta Colony Raipur District Raipur C.G. 2 - Deputy Registrar Address Cooperative Societies Vivekanand Nagar Raipur C.G. 3 - Lakhan Lal Raisth By Then Deputy Registrar Officer Of Deputy Registrar Society Vivekanand Nagar Raipur C.G. 4 - Namita Pal (Deleted) Nil 5 - Jitesh Pal S/o Late Ganesh Chand Pal The Respondent No. 4 To 6 Are VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2026.07.10 19:37:41 +0530
2 Resident Of Mig 206, Block C, Kancanganga Apartment Kabir Nagar Raipur District Raipur C.G. 6 - Ritesh Pal S/o Late Ganesh Chand Pal Resident Of Mig 206, Block C, Kancanganga Apartment Kabir Nagar Raipur District Raipur C.G. ... Respondent (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Mishra, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 10/07/2026
1. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh, duly constituted petition.
2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
3. The certified copy of the impugned order shall be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining an attested true copy thereof on record. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved