1 APHC010358162013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos: 33118, 33119, 30241, 30246, 30395 & 30398 of 2013 W.P.No.33118 of 2013: Between: 1. SRI DATLA BALARAMA RAJU BHAVANAM,, 73-12-9/3, AV APPARAO ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS TREASURER MATENA SATYANARAYANARAJU, S/O PAKEERRAJU, AGED 57 YEARS. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF RAJAHMUNDRY, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIDDARTH C B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ASC BOSE (SC FOR MC RAJAHMUNDRY) 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 2 W.P.No.33119 of 2013: Between: 1. RAJAHMUNDRY IRON HARDWARE & PAINTS MERCHANTS, ASSOCIATION KALYANA MANDAPAM, D. NO. 8-21-21, NEAR RATNA PALACE, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G. DISTRICT, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT BLNM GUPTA S/O SUBRAHMANYAM AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF RAJAHMUNDRY, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIDDARTH C B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ASC BOSE (SC FOR MC RAJAHMUNDRY) 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV W.P.No.30241 of 2013: Between: 1. SRI KALAVATHI KALYANA MANDAPAM,, 12-22-92, ARYAPURAM, RAJAHMUNDRY, EG DISTRICT, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR J. NIMBAN DAS S/O THADOMAL, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF RAJAHMUNDRY, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIDDARTH C B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. J DILEEP KUMAR 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV W.P.No.30246 of 2013: Between: 1. SRI GRANDHI SUBBARAO,, ANNAPOORNAMMA KALYANA MANDAPAM, RANGREEZUPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY REPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR G. VENKATESWARARAO, S/O SUBRAHMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIDDARTH C B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ASC BOSE (SC FOR MC RAJAHMUNDRY) 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV W.P.No.30395 of 2013: Between: 1. S.K.FUNCTION HALL,, D.NO.64-34-3/9/A, KORUKONDA ROAD,RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT,REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR G.SAKUNTHALA DEVI, W/O.RAJABABU, AGED 46 YEARS 4 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETRY,MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION , SECRETARIAT,HYDERABAD 2. THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF RAJAHMUNDRY, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIDDARTH C B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. J DILEEP KUMAR 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV W.P.No.30398 of 2013: Between: 1. SRI SUVARNA VARTHAKA SANGHAM,, D.NO. 9-25,79, GUNDUVARI STREET, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G. DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY G.V. V. PRAKASH S/O VEERABHADRARAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF RAJAHMUNDRY, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIDDARTH C B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. J DILEEP KUMAR 5 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV The Court made the following: ORAL COMMON ORDER: Sri C.B. Rammohan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri C.B. Sidharth, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, on instructions, seeks to withdraw these Writ Petitions as no cause survives. 2. Request granted. 3. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:03.02.2026 Vns