Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010199192026
2026:CGHC:28579
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 4738 of 2026 Umesh Sahu S/o Kumar Sahu Aged About 33 Years R/o Village - Dhongaitola, Police Station- Bhoramdev, District-Kabirdham (C.G.)
... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through - District Magistrate, Kawardha, District Karbirdham (C.G.)
... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Chandrikaditya Pandey, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Ms. Ritika Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 09.07.2026
1. Heard Mr. Chandrikaditya Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, and Ms. Ritika Verma, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the non- applicant/State, on I.A. No. 01 of 2026, an application seeking correction of the section clause in the present bail application.
2. It is submitted that during the course of the investigation, the offences punishable under Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 were added, in addition to Sections 69 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant has filed I.A. No. 01 of 2026 seeking to ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Digitally signed by ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Date: 2026.07.10 11:02:21 +0530
2 incorporate the aforesaid provisions in the present bail application by way of a correction application. However, such a course is misconceived and cannot be permitted. Accordingly, upon due consideration, I.A. No. 01 of 2026 is rejected.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to file a fresh bail application before the competent Court incorporating the offences punishable under Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
4. In view of the above, the present MCRC is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh bail application in accordance with law.
5. Ms. Ritika Verma, learned Panel Lawyer, is present. - Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Abhishek