Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25653 (HP)

Yog Raj v. State of H.P

CMP-T/456/2026 · 2026-09-30

Ranjan Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Yog Raj Vs. State of H.P. and Others CWPOA No. 6268 of 2019. 30.09.2026 Present: Mr. P.K. Verma, Additional Advocate General, for the petitioner. Mr. Vishwadeep Singh, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents No.1 to 3-State. Mr. Kashish Sharma vice Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.4. CMP.T. No. 456 of 2026: Instant application is for early hearing. In view of the averments the application is allowed. CWPOA No. 6268 of 2019: 2. Grievances of the petitioner is that he was engaged as a Drawing Master in Government Middle School, under the complex of GSSS Dheera, District Kangra. State Authorities filed a Supplementary Affidavit dated 30.04.2022, that the case of the petitioner, who was serving as a Drawing Master in GMS Lagan, under Complex GSSS Pangan [Kullu] through the Parents Teachers Association-Respondent No. 4 is entirely different from the case of Aarti Bala, Nisha Kumari, Sanjeev Kumar, Subhash Rana, Jeevan Lal, and Muneesh Kumar as in [Annexure P-6], who were engaged/appointed in another school i.e GSSS Dheera [Kangra] through PTAs after due selection, as per the GIA to PTA Rules. 3. Faced with above situation, Learned Counsel for petitioner prays for time to file sub-rejoinder. As prayed, let needful be done within three weeks. List on 17.11.2026. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 30, 2026 (Anita)