Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2565 (CAL)

GOBINDA DUTTA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/188/2026 · 2026-04-07

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L24 07.04.2026 Bpg. Dismissed C.R.M. (M) 188 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 read with under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Gangarampur Police Station Case No.160 of 2018 dated 28.06.2028 under Sections 302/120B/506 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act; Gobinda Dutta Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Kaushik Choudhury Mr. Dwaipayan Panda. …for the petitioner. Ms. Sreyashee Biswas Ms. Baishakhi Chatterjee …for the State Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 7 years 9 months and till date only 10 witnesses have been examined and the prosecution intends to examine 21 more witnesses. Records of the case reflect that over issue of dispute relating to cutting of bamboo allegedly the accused fired at the lady which resulted in succumbing to the injuries. There are other overt acts which have been attributed to the accused. I find that the act of the accused which has been complained of and has surfaced in evidence is beyond normal human character. There is delay definitely but an offence cannot be isolated only on the point of the trial not concluding. In spite of earlier directions, I direct the learned trial court to substantially 2 progress with the trial of the case within a period of six months from date. At this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM(M)188 of 2026 is rejected. Learned Registrar General, High Court, Calcutta will communicate this order to the ADG, CID, West Bengal who would monitor the progress of the case and will send subsequent reports if the accused prefers bail before this Court. Learned trial court is also directed to adhere to the directions passed. Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)