ARAVAPALLI BALA TRIPURA SUNDARI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/8557/2022 · 2026-02-09
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25648 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25648 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010583342022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8557/2022 Between:
1.ARAVAPALLI BALA TRIPURA SUNDARI, WIFE OF SRINIVASA RAO , AGE 41 YRS , OCC HOUSE WIFE , R/O DNO 7-339, GANESH NAGAR , MARKAPUR TOWN AND MANDAL PRAKASAM DIST , ANDHRA PRADESH 2.ARAVAPALLI SRINIVASA RAO, SON OF PANDU RANGA RAO , AGE 50 YRS , OCC ADVOCATE , R/O D NO 7-339 , GANESH NAGAR , MARKAPUR TOWN AND MANDAL , PRAKASAM DIST ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR , HIGH COURT OF AP AT AMARAVATHI 2.DUDEKULA NARASIMHULU, SON OF PEDDA GIDANNA , AGE 71 YRS , OCC AGRICULTURIST , R/O GUNDREDDIPALLI VILLAGE , KOMAROLE MANDAL , PRAKASAM DIST , ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2.M RAVINDRA The Court made the following:
2 ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the case has become settled before the Lok Adalath. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 10.02.2026 VTS