Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25643 (CAL)

M/S PIONEER LIVESTOCK v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRR/149/2026 · 2026-06-30

Rai Chattopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI 30.06.2026 Ct No.5 Item No.52 Ranita CRR 149 of 2026 In Re:- A petition under Sections 438/442, 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; corresponding to Sections 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; And In Re: M/s. Pioneer Livestock ..…Petitioner Ms. Ankana Rakshit Ms. Avisikta Das …for petitioner. Mr. Avrojyoti Das Ld. APP Mr. Atul Dang …for State. 1. This is a criminal revision filed by the petitioner with the allegations that inspite of the petitioner having prayed for release of sixteen buffalos seized by police in connection with Phansidewa Police Station dated 04.01.2026 under Section 317(5) of BNS 2023 along with Section 11 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Cruelty Against Animal Act, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siliguri, in his order dated February 10, 2026 has not considered such prayer of the petitioner. Thus 2 the petitioner is aggrieved due to non consideration of his prayer for release all sixteen buffalos. 2. Ms. Ankana Rakshit, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner states that in spite of taking into notice the prayer of the petitioner as above in his order dated February 10, 2026, the Magistrate has not considered the prayer of the petitioner. For the said reason, the petitioner is prejudiced and aggrieved. She states that an order may be passed by this Court relating to sixteen buffalos in terms of prayer of the petitioner made before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siliguri. 3. Considering the facts and circumstance, this Court finds service of his criminal revision application may not be imperative in this case. In stead the same may be disposed of with an appropriate direction. 4. Let this criminal revision be disposed of by directing the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siliguri, to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s prayer by dint of the put up petition dated February 10, 2026. Let it be done by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siliguri in a time bound manner, positively within a period of two weeks. 5. With the direction as above the instant criminal revision case is disposed of. (Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)