1 APHC010569742015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 736/2015 Between: 1. KARUMANCHI RAMADASU,, S/O SRI RAMULU, AGE 31 YEARS, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR, MUSUNURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, 2. BOLLA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O RADHAKRISHNA,, AGE 34 YEARS, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR, THOTLAVALLURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. GANJALA PHANI VASA BABU, S/O NARAYANA RAO,, AGE 30 YEARS, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR, VUVVURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. PENUMATSA SAGAR BABU, S/O SARVESWARA RAO,, AGE 35 YEARS, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR, PAMIDIMUKKALA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. MULLAPUDI NAGA RAJU, S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGE 31 YEARS,, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR, THOTLAVALLURU MANDAL, 2 KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. K.S.D. PRASAD,, S/O BASAVAIAH, AGE 37 YEARS, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR, PAMIDIMUKKALA MANDAL, KRISHSNA DISTRICT. 7. D. MOHAN RAO,, S/O DEVASAHAYAM, AGE 40 YEARS, WORKING. AS WORK INSPECTOR, PAMARRU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. K. SOMAIAH,, S/O RAMA RAO, AGE 33 YEARS, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR, NUZIVEEDU URBAN MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 9. BADUGU SHANKAR RAO,, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, AGE 34 YEARS, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR, VUVVURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 10. CH. RAVI KUMAR,, S/O. ARJUNA, AGE 26 YEARS, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR, NANDIWADA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 11. G. MANIKYA RAJ KUMAR,, S/O DANAIAH, AGE 44 YEARS, WORKING AS WORK INSPECTOR, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ALL ARE WORKING AS WORK INSPECTORS, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED, PARASUPETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. MR KALIKALA VALLAVAN I A S, MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED, H.NO.3-6-I84, 3 STREET NO.17, URDUGALLI, HIMAYATNAGAR, HYDERABAD. 2. MR CH PRATAP RAO, PROJECT DIRECTOR, THE A.P. STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED, PARASUPETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KRISHNA DISTRICT MACHILIPATNAM, - 4. THE A P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED, PARASUPETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willfully disobeying orders of this Hon'ble Court passed by HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE NOOTY RAM MOHAN RAO, in W.P.No.1751 of 2015 dt.04-02-2015 basing on the orders passed in W.P.No.35746 of 2014 dt.03-12-2014 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N M KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY 2. M RAVINDRANATH REDDY The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 736 of 2015 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 04.02.2015 passed in W.P. No.1751 of 2015. 2. On 25.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners and the matter was directed to be listed on 27.02.2026. On 27.02.2026, the matter was directed to be listed on 02.03.2026 under the caption <for orders.= Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent/Corporation submits that a letter has been submitted by 1st petitioner before the Registry seeking withdrawal of the present contempt case. 4. A perusal of the letter submitted by 1st petitioner goes to show that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the case any further and seek permission of this Court to withdraw the present contempt case. 5. In view of the contents of the withdrawal letter submitted by 1st petitioner and in view of the continuous absence of the petitioners, the 5 contempt case is closed, leaving it open to the petitioners to work out their legal remedies in the main writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 03.03.2026 ASR 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 736 of 2015 03.03.2026 ASR