Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010244802026
2026:CGHC:28858
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5043 of 2026 Jagmati W/o Late Ramcharan, Aged About 59 Years R/o Charcha Colliery, Tehsil Baikunthpur, Police Station Shivpur Charcha, District Koriya (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. The Chairman Cum Managing Director South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
2. Director Personnel, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, S.E.C.L. Head Quaters, Bilaspur (C.G.)
3. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Its General Manager Area Bhatgaon, Post Bhatgaon, District Surajpur (C.G.)
4. Sub Arena Manager, S.E.C.L. Katkona Colony Baikunthpur, District Korea
(C.G.)
5. Pinky W/o Late Narendra Kumar Aged About 28 Years Caste Panika, R/o Village Charcha Collirey, Thana Charcha, Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.)presently Working As Peon At General Manager Office, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Baikunthpur, District Koriya, (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.07.10 17:55:22 +0530
2 For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Kusum Lalchandani, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 to 4 : Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge
Order on Board 10/07/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not challenging any specific order in the present writ petition. He submits that respondent No. 5 has secured appointment by submitting forged and fabricated documents, including a forged consent letter, and despite repeated oral and written representations, no action has been taken by the respondent authorities. He, therefore, prays for a direction to the competent authority/SECL to consider and decide the petitioner's pending representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 1 to 4 submits that if the petitioner's representation is still pending before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within a period of three months, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as respondent No. 5, upon issuance of proper notice to all concerned.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present writ petition is
3
disposed of with a direction to respondents No. 1 to 4 to consider and decide the petitioner's pending representation, if the same is still pending, strictly in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and respondent No. 5. Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru)
JUDGE Jyoti