Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25633 (CHH)

PRERNA SWACHCHHATA KSHETRIYA STAR SANGATHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3491/2026 · 2026-07-06

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010252402026 2026:CGHC:27924 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3491 of 2026 Prerna Swachchhata Kshetriya Star Sangathan, Nagar Panchayat Bilaigarh Represented Through its Secretary Smt. Rani Bai W/o Mr. Satkumar, Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward No. 07 Purana Mangal Bazar Bilaigarh, Police Station And Township Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Urban Administration Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Joint Director, Department of Urban Administration And Development, Regional Office Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector, Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bilaigarh District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY Date: 2026.07.10 11:42:58 +0530 2 5 - The Chief Municipal Officer Nagar, Panchayat Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yashkarn Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. RS Patel, Advocate and Mr. Anway Tiwari, Advocate SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07/07/2026 1. Heard. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs : 10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record concerning the case of the petitioner from the respondent authorities for its kind perusal and consideration. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ directing respondent No.02 and to decide the representation (ANNEXURE P/8) in terms with the direction passed by this Hon'ble Court pending before it in a time bound manner. 10.3 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ directing respondent No.03 to decide the representation (ANNEXURE P/8) preferred by the petitioner in terms with the order of cancellation of agreement in a time bound manner. 10.4 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court, may deem fit and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in an earlier round 3 of litigation i.e. in WPC No.3061/2025, this Court vide order dated 20.6.2025, dismissed the petition, as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation/application before the concerned Collector raising all grievances as raised in the aforesaid writ petition. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertent mistake, it could not be pointed out that the appropriate authority to entertain the application is the Joint Director, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Regional Office, Bilaspur (Respondent No.2). He makes a limited prayer to dispose of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the said authority. 4. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the Joint Director, Department of Urban Administration and Development, Regional Office, Bilaspur (Respondent No.2) within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In turn, the concerned authority is directed to decide and consider the said application, if any, in accordance with law, within a further period of 45 days in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. 5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay