Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25628 (AP)

M/s.B.S.Constructions v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/29907/2025 · 2026-01-04

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010572162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 29907/2025 Between: 1. M/S.B.S.CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS PROP. B.SURESH, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, D.NO.10/422, NAGAVARAPPADU, ELURU ROAD, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PARADESH. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA SECRETARY - PANCHAYAT RAJ, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER EE, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, PRI DIVISION, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DY EE, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, PRI SUB DIVISION, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. THE CHIEF PLANNING MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS ACCOUNTS, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 29907/2025 M/S.B.S.CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS PROP. B.SURESH, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, D.NO.10/422, NAGAVARAPPADU, ELURU ROAD, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PARADESH. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL PANCHAYAT RAJ, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER EE, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, PRI DIVISION, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DY EE, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, PRI SUB DIVISION, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA THE CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS ACCOUNTS, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI M/S.B.S.CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS PROP. B.SURESH, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, D.NO.10/422, NAGAVARAPPADU, ELURU ROAD, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PARADESH. ...PETITIONER PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL PANCHAYAT RAJ, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER EE, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, PRI DIVISION, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DY EE, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, PRI SUB DIVISION, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS ACCOUNTS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in not making the final bill payment for the four works to an amount of Rs. Rs.2,50,000/- each totaling Rs. 10,00,0000/- for works undertaken by the petitioner vide respective Agreements No..,./2023-2024, dated 3.11.2023, No..../2023-2024, dated 12.9.2023, No..../2023-2024, 3.11.2023 and No..../2023-2024, dated 12.9.2023 for construction of community hall buildings under the MPLADS grant though the quality test control report also been issued and submitted the respective measurement books as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents to clear the final bills by raising the CFMS ID forthwit IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant interim direction directing the respondents to clear the bill amount of Rs. Rs.2,50,000/- each totaling Rs. 10,00,0000/- for works undertaken by the petitioner vide respective Agreements No..../2023- 2024, dated 3.11.2023, No..../2023-2024, dated 12.9.2023, No..../2023- 2024, 3.11.2023 and No..../2023-2024, dated 12.9.2023 for construction of community hall buildings under the MPLADS to the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B V ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORDER The writ petition is filed questioning the inaction of the respondents in payment of the bill amount for the works executed petitioner. 2. Sri Shaik Mukthiyar, learned counsel, representing Sri B.V.Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the amount claim in the writ petition has been paid to the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATED 5th DAY OF JANUARY, 2026. RR